PORTFOLIO AS EDUCATION AND EVALUATION TECHNOLOGY IN MEDICAL UNIVERSITY
Abstract
The authors of the article made a review of literary data on the use of the portfolio in medical education. Portfolio is used in the field of medical education as a tool for assessing students' abilities and a way to stimulate students to achieve final results in the educational process. This article describes the advantages and disadvantages of using an electronic portfolio, presents the methodology and strategic aspects of using a portfolio as an incentive for learning and a tool for assessing the knowledge and skills of students. The portfolio has a great potential, but its implementation in full in practice requires new pedagogical and educational approaches, as well as considerable time and effort from both teachers and students.
About the Authors
S. T. Kizatova
Karaganda state medical university
Kazakhstan
Kazakhstan
B. T. Tukbekova
Karaganda state medical university
Kazakhstan
Kazakhstan
S. B. Dyusenova
Karaganda state medical university
Kazakhstan
Kazakhstan
B. I. Abisheva
Karaganda state medical university
Kazakhstan
Kazakhstan
E. A. Korneyeva
Karaganda state medical university
Kazakhstan
Kazakhstan
References
1. Сборник практических руководств для медицинских преподавателей /Под редакцией З. З. Балкизова. - М., 2016. - 552 с.
2. Anderson R. S. Portfolio use in twenty-four teacher education program /R. S. Anderson, L. Demeulle //Teach. Educ. Q. - 1998. - V. 25. -P. 23-32.
3. Bird T. The schollteacher's portfolio: an essay on possibilities //The New Handbook of Teacher Evaluation: Assesing elementary and Secondary School Teachers /Eds. J. Millman, L. Darling-Hammond. - Newbury Park, CA: Corwin Press, 1990. - P. 241-256.
4. Bransford J. How People Learn: Brain, Mind, Experience, and School /J. Bransford, A. L. Brown, R. R. Cocking. - Washington D.C.: National Academy Press, 2000. - 402 p.
5. Buckley S. The educational effects of portfolio on undergraduate student learning: A Best Evidence Medical Education systematic review. BEME Guide No. 11 /S. Buckley, T. Ashcroft, J. Davis //Med. Teach. - 2009. - V. 31. - P. 282-298.
6. Darling-Hammond L. Implemetingcirriculum renewal in teacher education: managing organizational and plicy change /L. Darling-Hammond, A. Pacheco, N. Michelle //Prepairing teachers for a Changing World: What teachers should learn and be able to Do /Eds. L. Darling-Hammond, J. Bransford, P. Lepage, K. Hammerness et al. - San-Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 2005. -P. 442-479.
7. Davis D. A. Accuracy of phisician selfassessment comapared with observed measures of competence: a systematic review /D. A. Davis, P. E. Mazmanian, M. Fordis //JAMA. - 2006. - V. 296. - P. 1094-1102.
8. Davis M. H. Student perceptions of portfolio assessment process /M. H. Davis, G. G. Ponnamperuma, J. S. Ker //Med. Educ. - 2009. - V. 43. - P. 89-98.
9. Denzin N. K. Handbook of Qualitative Research /N. K. Denzin, Y. S. Licoln. - Thousand Oaks CA: Sage, 2000. - 234 p.
10. Driesen E. W. Web-or-paper based portfolio: is there a difference? /E. W Driesen., A. M. M. Muijtjens, J. Van Tartwijk //Med. Educ. - 2007. - V. 41. - P. 1067-1073.
11. Driesen E.W., Van Der Vleuten C.P.M. Matching student assessment to problem based learning: lessons from experience from law faculty /E. W. Driesen, C. P. M. Van Der Vleuten // Stud. Continuing Educ.- 2000.-V. 22-P. 235-248.
12. Driesen E.W., Van Der Vleuten C.P.M, Schuwirth L., Van Tartwijk J. et al. Credibility of portfolio assessment as alternative for reliability evaluation: a case study /E. W. Driesen, C. P. M/ Van Der Vleuten, L. Schuwirth //Med. Educ. 2005. - V. 39. - P. 214-220.
13. Driesen E. W. The self-critical doctor: Helping students to become more reflective /E. W. Driesen, J. Van Tartwijk, T. Dornan //BMJ. - 2008. - V. 336. - P. 827-830.
14. Driesen E. W. Conditions for successful reflective use of portfolios in undergraduate medical education /E. W. Driesen, J. Van Tartwijk, K. Overeem, J. D. Vermunt et al. //Med. Educ. -2005. - V. 39. - P. 1230-1235.
15. Driesen E. W. Portfolios in medical education: Why do they meet with the mixed success? A systematic review /E. W Driesen., J. Van Tartwijk, C. P. M. Van Der Vleuten //Med. Educ. -2007. - V. 41. - P. 1224-1233.
16. Driesen E. W. Use of portfolio in early undergraduate medical training /E. W. Driesen, J. Van Tartwijk, J. D. Vermunt //Med. Teach. -2003. - V. 25. - P. 18-23.
17. Duque G. Learning while velauting: the use of electronic evaluation portfolio in geriatric medicine clerkship /G. Duque, A. Finkelstein, A. Robert //BMC Med. Educ. - 2006. - V. 6.- P. 1-7.
18. Ericsson K. A. The influence of experience and deliberate practie on the development of expert performance //The Cambridge Handbook of Expertise and Expert Performance /Eds. K. A. Ericsson, N. Charness, P. J. Feltovich. - NY: Cambridge University Press, 2006. - P. 683-704.
19. Eva K. W. «I'll never play a professional football» and other fallacies of self-assessment / K. W. Eva, G. Regehr //J. Contin. Educ. Health Prof. - 2008. - V. 28. - P. 14-19.
20. Finlay I. G. A randomized controlled study of portfolio learning in undergraduate cancer education /I. G. Finlay, T. S. Maughan, D. J. Webster //Med. Educ.- 1998.-V. 32.- P. 172-176.
21. Friedriksen N. The real test bias: Influences of testing on teaching and learning //Am. Psychol. - 1984. - V. 39. - P. 193-202.
22. Friedman Ben-David M. AMEE Medical Education Guide No. 24: Portfolios as a Method of Student Assessment /M. Friedman Ben-David, M. H. Davis, R. M. Harden. - Dundee: Association for Medical Education in Europe, 2001. - 346 p.
23. Fung-Kee-Fung M. Internet based learning portfolio in resident education: The KOALA-super [TM] multicenter programme /M. Fung-Kee -Fung, M. Walker, K. Fung-Kee-Fung //Med. Educ. - 2000. - V. 34. - P. 474-479.
24. Grant A. J. Exploring student's perceptions of the use of a significant event analysis as a part of a portfolio assessment process in general practice, as a tool for learning how to use reflection in learning /A. J. Grant, J. D. Vermunt, P. Kennersley //BMC Med. Educ. - 2007. - V. 7. -P. 5.
25. Guba E. G. Judging the Quality of fourth generation evaluation /E. G. Guba, Y. S. Lincoln // Fourth Generation Evaluation /Eds. E. G. Guba, Y. S Lincoln. - London: Sage, 1989. - 244 p.
26. Hammerness K. How teachers learn and develop// Prepairing teachers for a Changing World: What teachers should learn and be able to Do /K. Hammerness, J. Bransford, D. C. Berliner. - San-Francisco: Jossey-Bass,2005. - P. 358-359.
27. Harden R. M. How to assess students: An overview //Med. Teach. - 1979. - V. 1. - P. 65-70.
28. Hatton N. Reflection in teacher education: Towards definition and implementation /N. Hatton, D. Smith //Teaching Tech. Educ. - 1995. - V. 11. - P. 33-49.
29. Kjaer N. K. Using online portfolio in postgraduate training /N. K. Kjaer, R. Maagard, S. Wies //Med. Teach. - 2006. - V. 28. - P. 708-712.
30. Korthagen F. A. J. Linking theory and Practice: The Pedagogy of realistik Teacher Education /F. A. J. Korthagen, J. Kessels, B. Koster. -NY: Lawrence Elbraum Associates, 2001. - 234 p.
31. Korthagen F. A. J. Teach teachers to reflect: Systematic reflection in training and coaching of teachers /F. A. J. Korthagen, B. Koster, K. Melief. - Soest: Uitgeverij Nelissen, 2002. - 212 p.
32. Lawson M. An e-portfolio in health professional education /M. Lawson, D. Nestel, B. Jolly //Med. Educ. - 2004. - V. 38. - P. 569-570.
33. Mathers N. J. Portfolios in continuing medical education - effective and efficient? /N. J. Mathers, M. C. Challis, A. C. Howe //Med. Educ. -1999. - V. 33. - P. 521-530.
34. Miller G. E. The assessment of clinical skillscompetence/performance //Acad. Med. -1990. - V. 65. - P. 363-367.
35. Oerman M. H. Developing a professional portfolio in nursing //Orthop. Nurs. - 2002. - V. 21. - P. 73-78.
36. Paulson F. L. What makes a portfolio a portfolio? Eight thoughfull guidelines that will help educators encourage self directed learning / F. L. Paulson, P. R. Paulson, C. A. Meyer // Edicational Leadership. - 1991. - P. 60-63.
37. Pearson D. J. Portfolio use in vocational training: A surwey of GP registrars /D. J. Pearson, P. Heywood //Med. Educ.-2004.- V.38.- P.87-95.
38. Shulman L. S. Teacher portfolios: a theoretical activity //Validating the New Teacher Professionalism /Ed. N. Lyons. - NY.: Teachers College Press, 1998. - P. 23-28.
39. Shute V. J. Focus on formative feedback //Rev. Educ. Res.-2008.- V.78.- P.153-189.
40. Smitter J. W. Can working with an executive coach improve multisource feedback ratings over time? A quasi-experimental field study /J. W. Smitter, M. London, R. Flaut //Pers. Psycol. - 2003. - V. 56. - P. 23-44.
Review
For citations:
Kizatova S.T., Tukbekova B.T., Dyusenova S.B., Abisheva B.I., Korneyeva E.A. PORTFOLIO AS EDUCATION AND EVALUATION TECHNOLOGY IN MEDICAL UNIVERSITY. Medicine and ecology. 2018;(4):27-32. (In Russ.)
Views: 133
Email this article 